• Home
  • Campus views
  • Thought leaders
    • Natural Resources
    • Democratic Institutions
    • Pluralism
    • Canada in the world
    • Building healthy communities
    • Innovation
  • Home
  • Campus views
  • Thought leaders
    • Natural Resources
    • Democratic Institutions
    • Pluralism
    • Canada in the world
    • Building healthy communities
    • Innovation
scroll down for more
Campus views

How do we bridge the engagement gap?

Michaela Catherine Slinger October 3, 2015 No Comments
Adam Scotti, Flickr - McGill students film their vote mob video for the 2011 federal election on campus. Apr 14 2011, Adam Scotti, Flickr
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google +
  • Email
McGill students film their vote mob video for the 2011 federal election on campus. Apr 14 2011

Morgan Baskin was born into a family passionate about social justice. She grew up at protests and dinnertime conversation revolved around the environment, gender and sexuality. “I was not encouraged to get involved in electoral politics in a formal way, but it was a logical extension for me when I saw a problem in electoral politics,” says Baskin. “I wanted to solve it — that was how we treated problems with society in my family.”

 

Her determination led her to run for mayor of Toronto in 2014. At the time, Baskin was 18.

 

While she didn’t win the mayoral race, Baskin’s bold move was remarkable. As a young Canadian engaged on a day-to-day basis in the issues she cared about, she saw the electoral system as a vehicle for her to make change in her city and country.  But by all accounts, Baskin is an anomaly among young Canadians.

 

According to Samara Canada, youth rates of civic participation outside of voting are 11 per cent higher than people in any other generation. Yet only 38.8 per cent of Canadians 18-24 voted in the 2011 federal election as opposed to 75.1 per cent of those aged 65-74. In short, as editor Tari Ajadi made clear in an earlier article, it’s not that youth aren’t engaged; they’re just not making the leap from engagement to voting.

 

Now a first-year student at Quest University Canada in Squamish, British Columbia, Baskin can reflect on her experience working inside a political system that only engages a minority of the youth population, and can understand why that gap between engagement and voting exists among young people. “Some [young] people have drunk the anti-millennial Kool-Aid, and just think [voting] is stupid,” Baskin recalls from her campaign. “Why would young people get involved in a system that’s not meant for them?”  

 

Morgan Baskin (credit: Zoē Gemelli)

According to Baskin, there’s an attitude among many young people that politics is “broken” and, more importantly, irrelevant to their daily lives. She says that using civic duty as a motivator for youth voting can “become a guilt trip [and] add to the negative impression of democracy.”

 

The experience of 20-year-old Rebecca Prior, who is also a resident of Squamish but does not attend university, is a perfect example of the barriers that face young Canadians when engaging in politics. Prior’s father sits on the Squamish City Council, and she was involved during his campaign and has helped him write various articles. She also works hard to keep up on provincial and federal politics, but recalls a distinct lack of outreach during this past election. Any local efforts to engage youth in the election, she said, were mostly focused on schools and the university. When local MP candidates attended the Squamish Farmers Market to partake in a debate, Prior only found out after the fact from the woman who ran the farmers market, despite the fact that she is so involved politically. The event was advertised in the newspaper and on the Farmers Market Facebook page, but neither is a place that youth typically flock to for information. According to Statistics Canada,  46.5 per cent of Squamish’s population is under the age of 36. Many young people move to the town for its outdoor sports scene and are easily found at, say, the local outdoor sports store or the pub where rock climbers congregate. Why, Prior asks, weren’t they targeted?

 

When it came to election time, Prior herself was the one to get her friends out to vote. “A lot of my friends just voted for who I told them to, because they didn’t pay attention at all,” she says.

 

Prior’s story is one example of how representatives of our democratic institutions, like the potential MPs, might allow otherwise engaged youth to fall through the cracks. According to the Broadbent Institute’s Millennium Dialogue report, 70 per cent of young Canadians believe that their views will be ignored by politicians. And why vote if you don’t think your vote will matter?

 

“A vicious cycle”

 

The fact that youth aren’t inspired to vote in Canada isn’t just a problem when they’re youth. A sustained pattern of youth voter disengagement could have a dangerous ripple effect on Canadian politics.

 

“If young Canadians don’t vote, research shows that we’re losing generations of voters for years to come because it’s habit forming,” says Caro Loutfi, Director of Operations at Apathy is Boring, a nonpartisan and charitable organization aimed at increasing youth political engagement. In other words, statistics show that if you don’t vote when you’re young, you’re less likely to vote when you’re old.

 

“By not engaging first time voters, we’re basically setting ourselves up for a failing democracy,” Loutfi continues. “If the overall trend of voter turnout for all Canadians keeps declining, in one generation we’ll have less than 50 per cent of the population show up to the polls on Election Day.” Loutfi says that such circumstances would put governmental policies into question because the government would become so drastically unrepresentative of the Canadian population. In short, the stakes for Canada are high.

 

“It’s a vicious cycle: youth don’t vote, therefore we don’t engage youth,” says Kaija Belfry-Munroe, a Canadian Politics professor at Quest University Canada. “It gets worse and worse and worse.”

 

The antidote? According to Baskin, instead of separating other forms of community engagement from electoral engagement, youth need a reason to connect the two — like Baskin did and like Prior tried. Instead of trying to get youth to vote for the sake of voting, she says, politicians need to find a way to say, “ ‘Hey, look at all of this stuff that you’re already doing. It’s great, it’s engagement, it’s political, so why don’t we add one more [aspect]: voting.’ ”

 

Bridging the gap

 

It’s not impossible. Some organizations are succeeding in creating a bridge that invites youth into electoral politics. What is important about these organizations is that they reach out to a wide range of youth. After all, besides inhabiting a common age range, the “youth” demographic is as diverse as any group of 5.5 million people can be.

 

One notable organization is CIVIX, a nonpartisan civic education charity. CIVIX reaches non-voting aged youth through schools to teach students about politics in a way that provincial curricula typically do not. Student Vote, CIVIX’s mock-election program, runs in elementary and high schools during federal and provincial elections. Students have the opportunity to go through the process of learning about parties and platforms and actually casting a ballot.

 

This year, Student Vote ran in about half of all schools across Canada during the federal election. CIVIX provides lessons, videos, Powerpoint presentations and other learning tools and resources to teachers or principals who sign their school up for Student Vote.

 

One of the most valuable impacts of the Student Vote program, according to Research and Communications Manager of CIVIX, Dan Allan, is the ripple effect it has beyond students; the converse of Loutfi’s dystopian scenario. “When we do our surveys of students and teachers [after the Student Vote program] we always hear that these students are going home and talking with their families about what they learned at school. Parents that weren’t going to vote beforehand are being inspired to vote,” says Allan. CIVIX’s surveys also showed that some students changed the way that their parents were going to vote by discussing the parties and platforms they learned about at school.

 

But CIVIX only reaches youth in elementary and high schools. Many other organizations go through college and university institutions, but the reality is that 40 per cent of youth in Canada are not enrolled in postsecondary education. If outreach is limited to educational institutions, it will naturally translate to a narrow understanding of youth issues.

 

As Ilona Dougherty, co-founder of Apathy is Boring puts it, “The more educated tend to actually be more engaged.” In other words, focusing only on those youth who are engaged in higher education can lead to an echo chamber effect: engaged youth continually have opportunities to get more engaged, and unengaged youth become further removed.

 

To counter this, Apathy is Boring teams go to other places outside of traditional institutions where young people are potentially less engaged. They hit music festivals and concerts to talk to youth and get them pledging to vote. In this way, Dougherty says, engagement initiatives seem less didactic or forceful and more like a genuine conversation.

Measuring impact

 

Adam Scotti (2011) – A group of students converge to form McGill student vote mob.

Apathy is Boring uses hard data and storytelling as metrics for success. “You need those numbers, but we realized that it’s almost impossible to actually quantify a shift in someone’s behaviour and a shift in feelings with regard to civic belonging,” says Loutfi. Getting hard data, then, is only made possible through collaboration with other stakeholders.

 

During the 2013 BC provincial election, Apathy is Boring partnered with Elections BC to evaluate their outreach strategies. Street teams hit the music festival scene and spoke to over 10,000 young British Columbians. They could be registered to vote on the spot with registration forms that Elections BC provided. The forms were tagged with a code associated to the organization.  

 

After the election, Elections BC was able to pull that data and see the number of people that registered through Apathy is Boring. “We compared the difference between the people that we registered and their voter turnout rates with the provincial average and its turnout rates,” says Loutfi. The young people that Apathy is Boring registered ended up voting at a 17.5 per cent higher rate than the provincial average for that same age group.

 

Beyond the ballot

 

Besides giving young people an engaging election experience or a personal invitation to vote, Apathy is Boring and CIVIX converge on the importance of extending engagement beyond casting a ballot.

 

CIVIX runs other programs during non-election times. One of these programs is Rep Day, where schools are connected with a local MP or Member of the Legislative Assembly for students to learn what their role is and how those politicians affect them directly. The street team for Apathy is Boring waited outside of polling stations after the most recent federal election to thank youth for making it to the ballot box, but also to remind them that their work wasn’t done.

 

“For us, in this election for example, it [was so] important to make October 20th just as important as October 19th,” says Loutfi.

 

Planned obsolescence

 

Organizations like CIVIX and Apathy is Boring recognize that they can still do more to help bridge the gap between community engagement and voting — perhaps through partnerships with organizations who aren’t focused on voter turnout, for example. Organizations like the YMCA or Red Cross “have access to a lot of young people, and youth engagement affects every single cause,” notes Dougherty. “You could talk about environmental rights, human rights or whatever — if young people are engaging with their communities and their democracy, that’s going to have an impact on a whole bunch of different areas of interest across our country.”

 

But demonstrating to youth how their voting can lead to real action on the issues they care about cannot rest on the shoulders of organizations like CIVIX and Apathy is Boring alone. In fact, Loutfi says, youth engagement initiatives should be a short term solution for the systemic makeover that must occur to reconnect youth and their communities with democracy. Eventually, she says, there should be no need for youth engagement organizations to exist.

 

What would this look like? Perhaps it will be Justin Trudeau who heads to the Squamish Valley Music Festival, or the cafeteria at Quest University Canada, or the next pipeline protest or documentary screening. He’ll talk to the youth in attendance about their local concerns, the momentum they’ve already created in their communities, and how Canada’s democratic system can support them further. This should be an issue relevant to Canada’s prime minister-designate, since he pledged to create a youth advisory council and involve young people in government.

 

To Mr. Trudeau, MPs, premiers, MLAs, mayors: we’re here, we’re engaged. Come find us where we are.

  • Share This:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google +
  • Email
Previous Where are we now?
Next How Affordable Housing Can Reduce Emissions
Michaela Catherine Slinger

Michaela is a third year student at Quest University Canada in beautiful Squamish, British Columbia. She started writing for her school’s newspaper, The Mark, in her second year, and is now the Arts and Culture Editor. Her interests within the social sciences are ever-changing. Future plans, in no particular order, may include curriculum designer, youth program director, journalist, singer-songwriter, motivational speaker, or permanently indecisive undergraduate student. The beauty of Michaela’s small liberal arts school is that no one declares a major — so before sorting out her own life, she decided to first sort out Canada’s future.


Tweet us at #PossibleCanadas

We want Canada to be...

  • Where are we now?
    Kevin Rey
    The same
  • How do we bridge the engagement gap?
    Michaela Catherine Slinger
    Engaged
  • How Affordable Housing Can Reduce Emissions
    Chris Adams
    Environmentally conscious
  • How do we build community in our cities?
    Cameron Raynor
    A community
  • How can Indigenous voices be better represented in the media?
    Alexander Kim
    Representative
  • How can we make bachelor’s degrees worth it for students?
    Chandler Walter
    Employed
  • How do we change who we’re really voting for?
    Josie Lukey
    Reformed
  • Can universities lead the movement towards reconciliation?
    Kate Black
    Reconciled

CREDITS

Produced by DISCOURSE MEDIA | Editor TARI AJADI | Contributing editors ERIN MILLAR, COLLEEN KIMMETT & CHRISTINE MCLAREN | Web development CAITLIN MILLAR | Engagement NELLY BOUEVITCH | Design MAGGIE CASPAR | Audio ALEXANDER KIM | Reporting ARNO ROSENFELD, KEVIN REY, CHRIS ADAMS, MICHAELA CATHERINE SLINGER, CAMERON RAYNOR, JOSIE LUKEY, CHANDLER WALKER, ALEXANDER KIM & KATE BLACK
Join the conversation on Twitter using hashtag #PossibleCanadas.

About

Possible Canadas is a partnership of diverse organizations that share the goal of supporting forward-looking conversations about the future of Canada. The project is produced by Discourse Media and Reos Partners, in collaboration with RECODE and the J.W. McConnell Family Foundation. Partners’ support does not imply endorsement of the views represented. Contact us at possiblecanadas@discoursemedia.org.

©2015 Discourse Media - Collaborative solutions journalism

From 1870 to 1996, more than 150,000 First Nations, Métis, and Inuit children were placed in residential schools and forbidden to speak their language and practice their culture. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) estimates there are 80,000 former students living today, and that the ongoing impact of residential schools are a major contributor to challenges facing modern Aboriginal populations.

Canada’s TRC is one of many commissions worldwide to undertake revealing and resolving past wrongdoings, mostly by governments. Other examples include:

South Africa

In 1996, President Nelson Mandela authorized a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to study the effects of apartheid in South Africa. The commission allowed victims of human rights violations to give statements about their experiences, but also allowed perpetrators of violence to request amnesty from criminal prosecution.

Argentina

The National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons, initiated in 1983, investigated human rights violations, including 30,000 forced disappearances, committed during the Dirty War.

Guatemala

The Historical Clarification Commission was created in 1994 in an effort to reconcile Guatemala after a 36-year civil war. The commission issued a report in 1999 which estimated that more 200,000 people were killed or disappeared as a result of the conflict.

In June, the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission released 94 “calls to action” to “redress the legacy of residential schools and advance the process of Canadian reconciliation.”

The scope of recommendations range from child welfare to education to Indigenous language rights, and has recommendations targeted for private and public spheres of Canadian life alike. The document calls upon law schools in Canada to require all students to take a course in Aboriginal people and the law, for example. Notably, the document calls upon the federal government to appoint a public inquiry into the causes of, and remedies for, the disproportionate victimization of Aboriginal women and girls.  

The 11-page document can be read here.             

http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/File/2015/Findings/Calls_to_Action_English2.pdf

MMP

STV

Canada’s employment statistics are much better now than they were 20 years ago. In 2012 for example, 61.8% of working-age Canadians were employed as opposed to 58.7% in 1995. The unemployment rate has gone down from 9.5% in 1995 to 6.8% in 2014. Youth unemployment has gone down too, from 16.1% to 13.5% in the same time period. The outlier in these trends is labour force participation, or the amount of working-age Canadians who are either employed, or unemployed and looking for work. Right now, participation is at the lowest rate since the year 2000, mainly because the “baby-boomer” generation is moving towards retirement. Read more about that here.

Housing preferences among Millennials, however, tend towards smaller, higher density housing close to activities, signs that changing economic realities and the generation shift will create more demand for housing in compact, walkable neighbourhoods.

Belfry-Munroe suspects that youth disinterest has to do with political parties. “There’s been a lack of engagement one-on-one with people since the 1970s, and a greater focus on mass media and now things like social media,” says Belfry-Munroe. “The other thing is that parties have become uncool,” she continues, “and I think that getting excited about the election without parties is like getting excited about the World Series without the teams. If you weren’t excited about the Blue Jays, you would not be concerned about the World Series.”

To extend this analogy, young Canadians currently aren’t even interested in baseball. What could work to change this would be getting other types of fans — soccer, golf, darts, you name it — engaged in baseball due to their passion for sports in general. Politically, this is the bridge that is missing for youth. The Blue Jays don’t matter if youth are removed from sports. Similarly, political parties and leaders would have little relevance if youth are removed from electoral politics.

“The generational effect is even larger [than the life cycle effect]. At the same age, turnout is 3 or 4 points lower among baby boomers than it was among pre-baby boomers, 10 points lower among generation X than it was among baby boomers, and another 10 points lower among the most recent generation than it was among generation X at the same age.”

— An excerpt from “Why Was Turnout So Low?” in Anatomy of a Liberal Victory by Andre Blais, Elisabeth Gidengil, Richard Nadeau and Neil Nevitte.

Rock The Vote also published a Youth Voter Strategy Report in 2007 that compiled many scholarly findings on this subject. You can find that here.

According to Elections Canada, “people are less likely to cast a ballot if they feel they have no influence over government actions, do not feel voting is an essential civic act, or do not feel the election is competitive enough to make their votes matter to the outcome, either at the national or the local constituency level.” Read more here.

The trend of youth voter disengagement persists across much of the developed world. According to the Economist, for example, in 2010 just 44 per cent of people aged 18 to 24 voted in Britain’s general election compared to 76% of those aged 65 and over. America saw its lowest voter turnout ever in its 2014 midterm elections, where just 19.9 per cent of young people voted, compared to an overall turnout rate of 36.4 per cent. This trend tends to change, however, when charismatic politicians reach out to youth. According to Politico, Barack Obama would have lost the 2012 American presidential election without youth voting — overwhelmingly for him. Read more here.


 

WordItOut-word-cloud-1200538